I did not talk nothing until now, because I did not see any problem with the PSEP almost all the functions had already implemented in the currente API then only a few changes will be necessary.
The current implementation the get function is mandatory then some work will be need, but I think this will be easy. Great work Mairas, thanks a lot. BR On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Hugo Parente Lima <[email protected] > wrote: > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 04:38:12 Matti Airas wrote: > > On 15.09.2010 10:20, Airas Matti.P (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Made a great many clerical updates to the PSEPs. > > > > > > First, with no further comments on the mailing list, I made PSEP 103 > > > Accepted (I told you this was on a fast track ;-)). Next we can proceed > > > to fixing the implementation. > > > > Jumped the gun here, shouldn't have done this without consulting the > > core dev team members. Guys, do you have any special concerns about PSEP > > 103? > > I promise a feedback until tomorrow =] > > > Cheers, > > > > ma. > > _______________________________________________ > > PySide mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > -- > Hugo Parente Lima > INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia > > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > -- Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Mobile: +55 (81) 8704-2144
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
