Hi all, I check the current PSEP 103, and I think it will be easy to implement. If everybody agree with the current text we can start this ASAP, maybe on the next sprint which start tomorrow. About the properties argument order I agree to keep the same order as Qt like Mairas did, this will avoid some mistakes and confusion.
BR On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi again, > > I had done my homework badly and omitted the "notify" argument from PSEP > 103. I took the liberty of adding that in the PSEP. I don't expect this to > break anyone's code (unless you declare a property and define all of the > positional arguments). > > If this is OK, we'll implement it ASAP. > > Next, I'll finally write a PSEP about Darren's idea of supporting property > decorators in PySide. > > PSEP: > http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0103.html > > Source: > http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0103.txt > > Diff to previous: > http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pseps/commit/bc2302be33191db51753f1611286c88fb499ac01 > > > Cheers, > > ma. > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > -- Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Mobile: +55 (81) 8704-2144 _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
