On 10.01.2011 06:11, ext Dan Lee wrote:
from the previous posts to the list about this last summer, it seems
like it's on hold for after 1.0, but it'll be in the works afterwards..
is that right? otherwise is there a voting procedure for PSEPs for users
to add a +1? the wordy property syntax seems to stick out the most for
me as a python user using pyside (as opposed to a c++ dev learning
python with pyside)
Hi Dan,
That PSEP has been left a bit hanging in mid-air because the proposed
changes aren't backwards-compatible. Personally, I love the concept, but
I'm really not sure how such backwards-incompatible changes should be
performed. If we had plenty of worthwhile changes queued up and
unlimited resources :-), we could aim for doing an API-incompatible
PySide 2.0 with all those changes there. However, real life strongly
pushes us towards more gradual changes.
So, I wonder could we come up with a clean way of switching on the
property syntax without unconditionally breaking the backwards
compatibility and without destroying the implementation efficiency
and/or maintainability? This would make it much easier to roll out this
and other similar features.
Cheers,
ma.
_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
