On Monday 29 August 2011 18:46:03 [email protected] wrote: > On Aug 30, 2011, at 00:32, ext Hugo Parente Lima wrote: > > On Monday 15 August 2011 09:07:50 [email protected] wrote: > >> Thanks! Looking pretty good already - I'm assigning it PSEP 106 > >> (should've done it earlier already). I took the liberty of adding the > >> post history and updating the discussion section for you. The latest > >> version is here: > >> > >> http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0106.html > > > > shiboken module done! > > > > It's already on mainline, i.e. it is going to be shipped on next PySide > > release. > > Ouch. Please hold a moment, I believe there has been slight > misunderstanding of the process. The PSEP is still a draft and hence, > can't be released in the mainline until it has been accepted. See PSEP 1 > for details: > > http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0001.html > > Basically, you should address the issues I raised, either by adding them to > the PSEP, or convincing me why they're a bad idea.
Well.. no issues were raised since the last PSEP version 17 days ago, not a single word since your "Looking pretty good already" and the release wont be made today or tomorrow but in one month so the PSEP implementation is into the current sprint, I don't if you review it but it's there. Anyway if the PSEP still a draft during the whole month until the release I can revert the commits before the release and raise the arm of the winner, bureaucracy... more than a month to decide an API with 7 plain functions, but fortunately I think this wont gonna happen. Maybe I misunderstood you, but I thought that the PSEP was ready to be implemented, sorry. > Cheers, > > ma. -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside
