On 05.03.2012 14:41, ext Anderson Lizardo wrote: > Hi Matti, > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Matti Airas<[email protected]> wrote: >> I am unsure about what would be the best way to deal with the existing >> Bugzilla bugs. I'd prefer disabling creating new bugs there as soon as the >> kinks with Jira have been ironed out, but there are currently 67 open bugs. >> One possibility would be to continue tracking them in Bugzilla in parallel >> with the new Jira bugtracker, but I don't know if they can be resolved >> before the old server goes away, so I'd be hesitant to take that approach. >> My proposal is that we simply comment on the open bugs and ask the reporters >> to re-submit the bugs to Jira if they still regard the bugs valid. > So, now that Jira setup is okay, can we proceed with this approach > (I've seen no comments with other ideas)?
I'm OK with that (but would like to get confirmation that this is the generally preferred approach). I've planned to make a blog post and mailing list announcements about the PySide project migration once we have the last migration bug fixed. I could amend the draft post to comment on the bug tracker migration. Then I could add a notification about the new bug tracker location on the Bugzilla front page and disable creation of new bugs in Bugzilla. I could also make a bulk comment on the old Bugzilla, requesting bug reporters to check whether the bug is still valid and to re-submit it in Jira. Does this sound OK to you? Cheers, ma. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
