On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Brett <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Am I right that the current plausible options for the longer term > maintainability of PySide are: > > 1) Hope for someone to rewrite shiboken in Python > 2) Write a new set of Qt bindings in swig? > > And that no-one has so far said that they have time to do the shiboken > rewrite? > > That - you - Anatoly - are offering time and expertise to try swig in > the near future? > > Then surely - as an outsider - the answer must be 'go for it - we'd > love to see how that goes'. No? > I am an outsider too. Just want to say that I am interested to rewrite to generator in Python if anybody can explain how it works (slides are better than texts). But if you're going to use C/C++ tool, I am of no help. It doesn't matter for me if it is Shiboken or SWIG - I can not read either code. From my past experience with Subversion bindings, SWIG was not for Python people.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
