On 11/07/13 21:53, John Ehresman wrote: > On 7/11/13 11:40 AM, Fabien Castan wrote: >> Has someone started some development or test for Qt5 support? >> ... >> I don’t know what is the difficulty to switch to Qt5. There is always a >> discussion about improving the binding tool with the binding of Qt5. Are >> these improvements really needed for Qt5 support? > We talked about this at the sprint and decided to look at alternative > binding tools in conjunction with supporting Qt5. The goal will be a > set of bindings that the developers who are currently supporting PySide > can more easily support and maintain. None of us were involved with the > development of shiboken and we would like to look at alternatives. > > That said, developer could begin looking at the changes required by Qt > 5. PySide is developed and maintained by the community and well thought > out patches and other changes to support Qt 5 would likely be accepted. >
I got a possible offer to do the migration to Qt5. Because I never looked into this, I am not quite sure how to estimate the hours. As far as I read here, I have the rough idea of 100 to 300 hours. Am I over- or under-estimating very much? cheers - Chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]> Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/ _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
