On 28/12/14 20:24, [email protected] wrote: > Can the whole shiboken-instead-of-boost-python thing be revisited? It is a > huge PITA to interface through shiboken when you have a C++ application using > QT and you provide some boost-python wrappers or have legacy C-python > wrappers for domain-specific code. The way shiboken+pyside are structured > now, you are in for a world of pain when embedding python in a native QT > application as opposed to driving the app from python scripts.
For the benefit of the conversation, this link is a useful one: http://setanta.wordpress.com/binding-c/ I'd love to see such stuff being added to something like xdress: http://xdress.org/, building on the pile of existing work that exists in this area. Essentially the existing libshiboken is used in conjunction with a more sane binding generation tool. Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
