Hi,
I'm forwarding a message that seems to be rejected by sourceforge
anti-spam machinery (spamassassin). Here are the reasons that
spamassassin is reporting to make it 'suspucious':
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.
0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
-2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
0.0 LOTS_OF_STUFF BODY: Thousands or millions of pictures,
+movies, etc.
Well, I think it that assassin has been a bit finicky here :-(
--
>0,0< Francesc Altet http://www.carabos.com/
V V Cárabos Coop. V. Enjoy Data
"-"
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I'm currently building a storage backend for so-called interest regions
in images. I have 90,000 images.
I started out by having one big group with one table per image (since
the number of regions per image is variable, this seemed like a nice
solution to me). All these tables have the exact same structure.
Now, I received a PerformanceWarning that having more than 4096 'image
tables' in a group will increase memory usage.
My question: should should I keep this big group? Or should I split it
into groups (which is possible in a natural way) of 200-500 images?
Which is more memory efficient? Does this make a big difference in
lookup performance? Or in 'creation/write' performance?
Thank you!
Koen van de Sande
--- End Message ---
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Pytables-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
