On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Francesc Alted <fal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/12 10:07 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Luke Lee <durdenm...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:durdenm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I haven't been getting the updates via email so I'm attempting to
> > post again to respond.
> >
> > Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I have a few questions:
> >
> > 1. What is the benefit of using the stand-alone carray project
> > (https://github.com/FrancescAlted/carray) vs Pytables.carray?
> >
> >
> > Hello Luke,
> >
> > carrays are in-memory, not on disk.
>
> Well, that was true until version 0.5 where disk persistency was
> introduced. Now, carray supports both in-memory and on-disk objects,
> and they work exactly in the same way.
>
Sorry for not being exactly up to date ;)
>
> --
> Francesc Alted
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got visibility?
> Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
> Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
> http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
> _______________________________________________
> Pytables-users mailing list
> Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Pytables-users mailing list
Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
