Thomas Wouters wrote: > > On 4/12/06, *"Martin v. Löwis"* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > This raises the question whether modules should be able to > participate in cyclic GC... > > Don't they already? They have a traverse proc, just not a clear proc.
It's been suggested before that the explicit clearing of a module at interpreter shutdown should be replaced with just letting cyclic GC do its thing. Is there any reason why that wouldn't work? It might lead to less of the unintuitive behaviour that sometimes occurs because of this. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
