On 4/19/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even if it did become available, we might not want to > use it. In recent times I've come round to the view that, > on modern architectures where cacheing is all-important, > refcounting + cyclic garbage collection may well be > *better* than mark-and-sweep or some variation thereof.
Not that I disagree -- do you have specific data or reasoning to back this up? I'd love to hear that we were right all the time! :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
