Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 4/19/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm, the reference to Dylan's next method (along with a few other comments in
>> this thread) makes me believe a magic autosuper() equivalent would really
>> need
>> to be based on a thread-local context, rather than any kind of static code
>> analysis.
>
> No, no, no! The current thread doesn't enter into it. It *must* be
> done through static code analysis. The inputs are the class and the
> instance. There's nothing that the thread can add.
Involving the thread was a really roundabout way of getting at the class.
Using closures is far more sane, but the historic disconnect between classes
and closures meant my brain failed to make that connection :(
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
