Michael Urman wrote:
> There's a lot of holes to this story, including at least how these
> functions are registered, and which additional arguments (if any) are
> necessary. Shall we try to fill these holes in?
Answering without checking the source (which is undoubtedly a bad idea), but
this sounds like something else that could be addressed if it was possible to
either register an alternate AST compiler for a scope, or else get hold of an
AST and recompile it. (The former works for modules and functions, the latter
works only for functions)
Even if it was only a matter of some additional keyword arguments to compile
and/or exec, it could at least be of benefit for plugin code or an interactive
interpreter loop.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
