Greg Wilson wrote:
>> A set with no elements is:
>> set()
>
> I prefer Guido's earlier suggestion of {/} for the empty set (assuming no
> parsing ambiguities?):
I believe the leading '{' should be enough to clue the parser in to what's
going on (i.e. '{/<anything>' is currently a syntax error)
I think I'm a convert - +1 for set literals, with {/} for the empty set.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
