Giovanni Bajo wrote: > > Since this is still well into the future, by the time Py3k rolls > > around it might be possible to include the option of easy-installing > > various packages from the Python installer. > > As usually said, this would be miss the *main* point of having a standard > library: consistency across Python installations.
hopefully, the Py3K distributors will use semi-automatic tools to download all they need to build a battery-included release. pushing all that over to the end users would be a major mistake. (python-dev and others could provide "profiles" for well-known and tested configurations; e.g. "psf standard", "scientific", "sumo", ...) </F> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
