On 5/1/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes.
It doesn't matter. Either case is confusing, one way or another, as Tim has already argued. Changing it would be a big mistake. If you want me to come with more comprehensive arguments (other than what Tim already covered), please come with more comprehensive arguments *for* the change, too.
Thomas Wouters wrote:
> > join()
> >
> > it's time to make this a builtin. the "it's the separator that's doing
> > the
> > joining" idea is silly and unintuitive, and should be fixed.
>
>
> I disagree, and I believe that would be a big mistake to change it.
big mistake?
Yes.
can anyone point to one other example where "call method on
literal" is used in Python ?
It doesn't matter. Either case is confusing, one way or another, as Tim has already argued. Changing it would be a big mistake. If you want me to come with more comprehensive arguments (other than what Tim already covered), please come with more comprehensive arguments *for* the change, too.
--
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
