Le samedi 06 mai 2006 à 08:05 -0400, Blake Winton a écrit : > Bill Janssen wrote: > > GvR writes: > >>On 5/5/06, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>Is there anywhere else in Python where the type of an object isn't > >>>>>checkable with isinstance()? > >>>>Yes, it's called duck typing. > >>>And, in my opinion, it's probably worth stomping out in Py3K. > >>You want to get rid of all duck typing? That doesn't sound right to > >>me. Anyway it isn't enforceable. I must be misunderstanding you. > > Yes, I meant "get rid of all duck typing". Duck typing is for > > languages that can't do any better. It's a weakness, not a strength.
If you want a Python-lookalike with strong static typing (and optional duck typing with the "duck" keyword!), then try Boo: http://boo.codehaus.org/Home Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
