Please don't cross-post python-dev and python-3000. This proposal will not be adopted in Py3k. Instead, range() will become more like xrange().
--Guido On 6/13/06, Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You were bothered yet with function xrange ? :) I suggest to replace it. > > --------------------------------------------- > for i in xrange(100): pass > vs. > for i in int[:100]: pass > --------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------- > for i in xrange(1000, 1020): pass > vs. > for i in int[1000:1020]: pass > --------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------- > for i in xrange(200, 100, -2): pass > vs. > for i in int[200:100:-2]: pass > --------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
