On 8/8/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I personally don't see much of a use for set literals, considering that > there is a non-ambiguous spelling of it currently; set(...), whose only > cost above and beyond that of a set literal is a global name lookup.
I thought one of the main arguments in favor of set literals is that a literal form would allow the compiler to perform optimisations that the set(...) spelling doesn't allow. Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
