Paul Prescod wrote:
> If we get past the meta-discussion, I don't really see any disagreement
> left. I'll grit my teeth and avoid commenting on the meta-discussion. ;)
Ah, so I'm not the only one doing that then };>
> My proposed text for the PEP is as follows:
Generally +1, except for this bit:
> "In Python 3000, semantics will be attached to the following types:
> objects of type string (or subtype of string) are to be used for
> documentation (though they are not necessarily the exclusive source of
> documentation about the type). Objects of type list (or subtype of list)
> are to be used for attaching multiple independent annotations."
Interpretations of string & list subtypes should be up to whoever creates
those subtypes - it's only the builtins themselves that python-dev should be
the authority for.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
