Georg Brandl wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Implementation Language
>> ==================
>>
>> Python 3000 will be implemented in C, and the implementation will be
>> derived as an evolution of the Python 2 code base. This reflects my
>> views (which I share with Joel Spolsky) on the dangers of complete
>> rewrites. Since Python 3000 as a language is a relatively mild
>> improvement on Python 2, we can gain a lot by not attempting to
>> reimplement the language from scratch. I am not against parallel
>> from-scratch implementation efforts, but my own efforts will be
>> directed at the language and implementation that I know best.
>
> I had already added something to PEP 3099, but if you like that approach
> better, I'll add that to PEP 3000.
You can always keep both :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
