Guido van Rossum wrote: > Perhaps a compromise could be to add a keyword parameter to request > such an exception?
But who is going to bother using such a keyword, when it's not necessary for correct operation of the program in the absence of bugs? > (We could even add three options: truncate, pad, > error, with truncate being the default, and pad being the old map() > and filter() behavior.) This seems to fall foul of the no-constant-parameters guideline. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
