"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Even if CPython 3.0 supports a dynamic choice (which some are
> proposing) then the *language* will still make it implementation
> dependent because of Jython and IronPython, where the only choice
> is UTF-16 (or UCS-2, depending the attitude towards surrogates).
Jython and IronPython could use a dual UCS-2 / UTF-32 encoding
(with some work and interoperability overhead I admit).
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
