Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> Anyway, the proposal was in no way suggesting moving away from duck
> typing. The new iter was to be a _wrapper_ around any existing
> iterator, not a base class for iterators.
the OP seems to think otherwise:
The key points are:
/.../
3. Make this type a base for all other (existing and future) iterator
types, e.g. xrange and generator.
</F>
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
