Ivan Krstić wrote: > That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is "we absolutely must have > full support for anonblocks to be able to do this *elegantly*", i.e. > while avoiding special-cased solutions.
As I've tried to say several times in my other posts in this thread, from a theoretical computer science perspective, Python's all about "special cases". Python's design values elegant solutions for groups of *practical* problems observed in the wild, over hyper-generalized solutions to problems designed in a laboratory. That's what makes the language so darn practical to use ;-) </F> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
