On 11/25/06, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I stand by my assessment that they can make metaclasses > look straightforward -- but that is partly because metaclasses have > had their roughest edges worn off already. (For example, they no > longer require compiling a C class so odd that the pattern gets named > after someone.) If GF explanations start to come from several > different people, the same process should eventually simplify them. > If that happened quickly enough, it would change the tradeoffs.
Did you read my blog post where I give my own interpretation and implementation? http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=155514 -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
