And it's in the p3yk branch, too. The main reason these are all still drafts is that I expect that implementing them may cause a certain amount of redesign, and in some cases the spec isn't entirely clear. The "real" acceptance status (in my head) is all over the map -- 3102 is obviously accepted, 3101 likely, 3103 unlikely, 3104 possibly, 3108 is too early to tell, and the rest (3105, 06, 07, 09, 10) are accepted.
--Guido On 2/17/07, Eduardo EdCrypt O. Padoan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/17/07, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know about the others, however I want to speak to the issue of > > 3101 and 3102, since I wrote them - the main reason that those PEPs > > haven't been accepted is that there's no sample implementation to > > evaluate. (At least, I'm not aware of any implementation of them, unless > > someone did it while I wasn't looking :) > > At least for 3102, yes, someone did: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1549670&group_id=5470 > > -- > EduardoOPadoan (eopadoan->altavix::com) > Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/edcrypt > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
