On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:15:20 +1300, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thomas Wouters wrote: >> >> I'm not sure what makes you say that. There isn't anyone actually using >> bytes() right now, so what makes you think how it's created? > >That's my point -- you *don't* know how any given bytes >object was created, so there's no reason to display it >in anything other than the most generic way. > >Another thing is that the idea of displaying a mutable >object in a way that closely resembles a non-mutable >literal makes me uncomfortable. Actually, writing that >sort of literal makes me uncomfortable too, but I'm >not sure what to do about that. >
[1, 2, 3] (1, 2, 3) :) Jean-Paul _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
