At 12:40 PM 3/10/2007 -0800, Josiah Carlson wrote: >Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I strongly feel that this makes *using* metaclasses way too complex. A > > person wanting to create a C struct or a database record should simply > > have to say "metaclass=cstruct" - they shouldn't have to declare a bunch > > of individual pieces, all of which have to match with each other. > > There's no utility in being able to "mix n' match" metaclasses and dicts. > > > > In any case, we're just going over old ground here. > >Great! If there is no need to mix and match metaclasses and dicts >arbitrarily, then there is no need to pass alternate parameters to the >dictionary construction method,
Er, wha? Those two things are utterly unrelated. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
