Guido van Rossum wrote: > How about 0t660? > This is most symmetric with 0xffe for hex, as it is the 3rd letter of > the word in both cases.
I like it. > I think we also approved 0b101010 for binary numbers, didn't we? Although for consistency with 0x an 0t it would have to be 0n, wouldn't it? :-) -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
