On 3/15/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please. No discussion of generalized radixes.
I agree. I was just stating the obvious that, if we allow 16r100, somebody will ask why not 21r100. > > Also, IMO Tim's proposal changes too much; there's nothing wrong with 0b and > 0x. 0b and 0x it is. Pat _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
