On 3/21/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/21/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/21/07, brett.cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When removing indexing/slicing on exceptions some places were changed > > > inappropriately from ``e[0]`` to ``e.message`` instead of ``e.args[0]``. > > > The > > > reason it needs to be the last option is the dichotomy of 'message' and > > > 'args': > > > 'message' can be the empty string but args[0] can have a value if more > > > than one > > > argument was passed. > > > > So e.args is going to stick around in 3.0? > > I think so.
I just posted on my blog about this. I am curious to see what the general public think, but I suspect it will stay as well. I was cranky at the sprint because of my 'args' removal. Don't need to make more people cranky. > e.message OTOH I think we can kill (perhaps deprecate it > in 2.6; it was added in 2.5, this may be a record :-). Should we just consider this a PDFL pronouncement, or should we more formally run this past python-dev? -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
