On 5/1/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:13 AM 5/1/2007 -0700, Talin wrote: > >I don't care for the idea of testing against a specially named argument. > >Why couldn't you just have a different decorator, such as > >"overload_chained" which triggers this behavior? > > The PEP lists *five* built-in decorators, all of which support this behavior:: > > @overload, @when, @before, @after, @around
Actually @before and @after don't support __proceeds__, according to the first draft anyway. I think I would prefer to *always* pass the next method to @around methods, which always need it, and *never* pass it to any of the others. What use case am I missing? The one in the PEP involves foo(bar, baz), not a very convincing example. -j _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
