On 5/13/07, Arvind Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/14/07, Anders J. Munch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> This PEP talks about support for *identifiers*. If you need *extensive* > vocabulary for your *identifiers*, I'd assume that you're coding something > non-trivial (with ignorable exceptions). Such non-trivial code should be > sharable under a _common_ language that *others* can understand as well, > IMHO. But that common language might well be Japanese, particularly if you are writing for a specific customer which happens to be a Japanese company. > Further, if you are doing something non-trivial, I can also assume that > you'd be using third-party libraries. How would the code look if identifiers > were written in various encodings? The core of CPython prefixes its identifiers with Py_ to distinguish them from other libraries. I suspect that a Chinese character vs a Latin character would be almost as distinctive as whether or not the identifer starts with "Py_" -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
