You've missed a few of my mails. I liked the reports from the Java world. On 5/17/07, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 17/05/2007 18.48, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > I have accepted PEP 3131. > > Do you have a rationale to share with us? Especially given that your previous > public mails about the PEP looked mostly against it. This way, the rationale > can be embedded in the PEP for future reference. > > Thanks! > -- > Giovanni Bajo > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
