--- Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ideally, either that equivalence would also include
> compatibility, or
> else characters whose compatibility and canonical
> equivalents are
> different would be banned for use in identifiers.
>
Current Python has the precedence that color/colour
are treated as two separate identifers, as are
metre/meter, despite the equivalence of "o" to "ou"
and "re" to "er," and I don't think that burns too
many people. So I'm +1 on the unquoted third option,
that canonically equivalent, but differently encoded,
Unicode characters are allowed yet treated as
different.
Am I stretching the analogy too far?
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready
for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
