Guido van Rossum wrote:
> A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP
> 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any
> others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+
> range. I can see two forms of renaming:
>
> (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number
>
> (b) just use the next available number
>
> Preferences?
>
> What other PEPs should be renumbered?
>
> Should we renumber at all?
>
+1 for renumbering to the next available 31xx number, with the old
number kept as a pointer to the new one.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
