Talin wrote: > Eric V. Smith wrote: >> I have hooked up the existing PEP 3101 sandbox implementation into the >> py3k branch as unicode.format(). It implements the earlier PEP syntax >> for specifiers. > > Woo hoo! Thanks Eric. This is great news. > > At some point I'd like to build that branch myself, I might send you > questions later.
I'm currently just developing in the py3k branch. I know this is sub-optimal, since I can't check in there until the PEP is accepted. The original PEP 3101 sample implementation was in sandbox/pep3101, and was never a branch, because it was built as an external module. Maybe I should create a py3k-pep3101 (or py3k-format) branch, so I can check my stuff in? > I'm not sure that I'm happy with my own syntax proposal just yet. I want > to sit down with Guido and talk it over before I commit to anything. I'll have some comments in the thread with your proposal. > This would be easier if I was sitting in a room with other Python > programmers so that I could show them various suggestions and see what > their emotional reactions are. I'm having a hard time doing this in > isolation. That's kind of why I want to meet with Guido on this, as he's > good at cutting through this kind of crap. Good luck! I'm open to private email, or chatting on the phone, if you want someone to bounce ideas off of. Eric. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
