On 9/2/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PEP 3115 says a metaclass' __prepare__ takes two positional arguments,
> name and bases. But the example has it actually accept an arbitrary
> number of arguments: name and then everything else is bound to bases.
>
> Which happens to be true? I'm too tired to even fully trust that I am
> reading the PEP correctly, so I am not about to try to write an
> example to see which is correct and come up with a coherent rewording
> if I am right about what is wrong. =)
I think you're misreading what you think is an example. I'm assuming
you're referring to this code:
def prepare_class(name, *bases, metaclass=None, **kwargs):
if metaclass is None:
metaclass = compute_default_metaclass(bases)
prepare = getattr(metaclass, '__prepare__', None)
if prepare is not None:
return prepare(name, bases, **kwargs)
else:
return dict()
This indeed *defines* a function with a *bases argument, but it is not
called __prepare__! It *calls* __prepare__ passing it name and bases,
i.e. the 2nd argument to prepare is a tuple of bases.
The only example defining __prepare__ later in the PEP takes two
positional arguments (name and bases again).
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
