Fred Drake wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Should the __future__ be cleaned out for 3k, or should all future
>> imports
>> continue to work and do nothing?
>
> They should continue to work.
>
> One advantage of keeping the existing feature table in the __future__
> module is that is makes it easier to avoid re-using a feature name; I
> think there's merit in that.
While I don't object to that (I agree keeping the history in the
__future__ module is a good thing), 2to3 should probably strip them
anyway, since they're now redundant.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
