Neil Toronto wrote: > The problem is that, like all the binary operators, "orderable" is only > defined for pairs of types.
I'm loathe to mention it, but it sounds like what's needed for this is generic functions on types... -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
