Martin v. Löwis wrote: > It's currently called lib2to3, > so I can't see why two2three would be better
I was just thinking that '2to3' wouldn't be a valid module name. I guess 'lib2to3' works too (or 2), and is easier 2 type 2. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
