Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > Also, I question whether the proposed API is correct. ISTM that any code > that sets the *dst* > parameter is guaranteed to be wrong (hardwiring-in a value that will change > every few months). Can you elaborate on this? ISTM that your argument would equally apply to C/POSIX mktime() API. It won't be the first time C/POSIX got time handling wrong, but I doubt it is the case in this instance. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9527> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
