Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

> Does this suggested 'improvement' make sense?

Sorry, it doesn't make sense for a number of reasons.

* First the str.split() is already too complex.  It took years to get the docs 
for it to be correct and informative (two different algorithms, etc).

* Second, it would overly complicate the implementation and preclude various 
kinds of string search optimizations (i.e. that is why fgrep, grep, and egrep 
are still separate).

* Third, at some point, when you need a regex, you just need to use a regex.  
It would be a mistake to reinvent regex capabilities in string objects.

----------
nosy: +rhettinger
resolution:  -> rejected
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11162>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to