Sébastien Sablé <sa...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

test_largefile complains about the filesystem having no largefile support.
It is probably the case, I will ask a sysadmin, and see if he can get me a file 
system with large file support so that I can test this feature.


> ./python -Wd -E -bb ./Lib/test/test_largefile.py 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./Lib/test/test_largefile.py", line 163, in test_main
    f.write(b'x')
IOError: [Errno 27] File too large

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./Lib/test/test_largefile.py", line 192, in <module>
    test_main()
  File "./Lib/test/test_largefile.py", line 168, in test_main
    raise unittest.SkipTest("filesystem does not have largefile support")
unittest.case.SkipTest: filesystem does not have largefile support
[81125 refs]

In the meantime, this test should probably be skipped just like in 
test_largefile.py and the patch with _LARGE_FILES should probably be applied 
too.

Merci pour l'aide

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11184>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to