Sébastien Sablé <sa...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment: test_largefile complains about the filesystem having no largefile support. It is probably the case, I will ask a sysadmin, and see if he can get me a file system with large file support so that I can test this feature.
> ./python -Wd -E -bb ./Lib/test/test_largefile.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./Lib/test/test_largefile.py", line 163, in test_main f.write(b'x') IOError: [Errno 27] File too large During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./Lib/test/test_largefile.py", line 192, in <module> test_main() File "./Lib/test/test_largefile.py", line 168, in test_main raise unittest.SkipTest("filesystem does not have largefile support") unittest.case.SkipTest: filesystem does not have largefile support [81125 refs] In the meantime, this test should probably be skipped just like in test_largefile.py and the patch with _LARGE_FILES should probably be applied too. Merci pour l'aide ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11184> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com