Alexis Metaireau <ale...@notmyidea.org> added the comment: Hi,
I was more thinking about something like: if the license is specified in the "License" metadata, then check that it's not a well known license (which can and must be provided by the classifiers instead). At the end, the code you've wrote is useful, but not complete. Additionally, it seems that your patch make check complaining if you just have *defined* classifiers and license (even if the license is not provided in the classifiers: it complains if there is both defined, regardless what is defined). It should check instead if the classifier field contain the same thing than the license field. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11219> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
