Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Le samedi 19 février 2011 à 10:45 +0000, Mark Dickinson a écrit : > Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Unassigning. I don't think that r82043 is the *real* culprit here; that > bugfix just happened to expose a deficiency in the peepholer; one that's > already present in other situations: > > >>> dis.dis(lambda: 2*(3*4)) > 1 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (2) > 3 LOAD_CONST 4 (12) > 6 BINARY_MULTIPLY > 7 RETURN_VALUE > >>> dis.dis(lambda: (2*3)*4) > 1 0 LOAD_CONST 5 (24) > 3 RETURN_VALUE > > Antoine, does your patch take care of this case too?
It should. Can you test? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11244> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
