Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Benchmark under 3.x (without obsolete patch): - fork + execv + waitpid: 4794.4 ms - os.popen: 19792.9 ms - subprocess.popen: 10152.1 ms
Benchmark under 2.x (without patch:) - fork + execv + waitpid: 4292.7 ms - os.popen: 12697.6 ms - subprocess.popen: 5496.3 ms Looks like there's a regression on both os.popen and subprocess.popen. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11314> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com