Eugene Toder <elto...@gmail.com> added the comment: Alexander, my patch does 2 optimizations: doesn't insert a new constant if one already exist and removes unused constants after peephole is done. You patch seems to do only the latter. It's very similar, from a quick look at your patch: - My patch doesn't introduce any additional passes over the code (you added 2 passes). - It preserves doc string. - It's less code, because I reuse more of existing code.
Feel free to look at the patch and tell me if you don't agree. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11462> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
